Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part VI: discussion.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Check if the discussion has a clear inverted funnel shape with distinct sections providing: -A summary of main findings (What did we find?); -Comparisons with other studies (What is known?, What is new?, and How does this fit in?), -Strengths and limitations (Are the findings true? -Implications (Are the findings important? What can we do with them?). Answer the research question in the first paragraph and check if this is in line with the research question posed in the introduction (hourglass model). Check to see if the discussion section does not present new results. Be frank about acknowledging limitations. Ensure it offers a clear ending to the storyline of the paper (citable statement). Formulate a clear and concise one-liner as the bottom line of the paper. 1. What you should know
منابع مشابه
Basics of Research Paper Writing and Publishing
Writing and trying to publish research and its findings is an integral part of a researcher’s professional life. However, writing is not in every researcher’s talent pool, and the obstacles of making reviewers accept the own submission are often nerve-wracking. This paper gives an introductory report on basic issues of writing and organizing scientific papers, and preparing them for submission ...
متن کاملIntroducing a new series on effective writing and publishing of scientific papers
This article introduces a series of writing tips that will appear each month in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (JCE ) over the next year. The 12 papers aim to cover the whole process from starting to write the first draft of a paper to responding to reviewer comments (Table 1). The primary target audience are novice academic researchers, although the series may also be useful for senior r...
متن کاملEffective writing and publishing scientific papers, part IX: authorship.
Discuss authorship and develop a written authorship document (including lead authorship) at an early stage during a project. Check and follow ICMJE criteria on contributorship and authorship. Authors should have (1) contributed substantially to the conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; (2) contributed to writing the paper or revising it critically f...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of clinical epidemiology
دوره 66 10 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013